I am of the opinion that there is a grain of truth in many a conspiracy theory and considerably more than that in “the word on the street.” This is probably due to me overhearing my mom’s shop talk when I was a kid (she was a hair stylist) and seeing her sources confirmed, or at least seriously considered, during my copious consumption of investigative journalism and, admittedly, it’s black sheep cousin/sister…ahem…yellow journalism.
Case in point: my mother always said she believed that Texas millionaire, racketeer and church elder Billy Sol Estes and his business associate, former U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson, were in involved in the JFK assassination.


You see, my mom had the skinny on Sol Estes because during his hey day–the early 60s–she lived and plied her trade in his stomping grounds–Pecos, Texas (pop. 10,000). There, “Billy Sol” was a tractor sized wheel who threw lavish parties for Texas Democrats at his 26,000 acre ranch on Saturdays and preached sermons on the evil of dancing as a lay minister of the Church of Christ on Sundays.
Later, after he served two stints in prison, much was written about his agricultural schemes, the suspicious deaths of seven men tied to those schemes, his embezzlement of funds from the coffers of the Christian schools he oversaw, his connections to LBJ and his knowledge of the assassination conspiracy. In 1984 he testified before a grand jury promising to spill his guts about the whole sordid mess if he was granted immunity.
He wasn’t, so he didn’t; not then, anyway. He did spill them in a book about it thirty years later though, claiming LBJ aid Mac Wallace was one of the shooters, acting on Johnson’s behest. But that was years after I first heard my mother espouse similar theories based, primarily, on beauty shop gossip.
Now I’m not saying I believe my mom’s theory (long time Donald J. Trump friend and Republican dirty trickster, Roger Stone believes it; he also wrote a book about it) but I’m not saying I don’t believe it either. There’s no definitive proof.
There is, however, compelling circumstantial…I wouldn’t say evidence...indicators…pointing to plausibility. Then again…

And now that I’ve brought up Roger Stone, it’s a good time to segue into the Q-anon conspiracy theory…the one about the cabal of Satanic Democrat pedophiles who drink the blood of infants and with the assistance of “Hollywood” (and I’m presuming Broadway and the recording industry as well, with the exception of traditional Country artists circa 1989) would have taken over the world, if not for former President Trump.
Yeah, that Q-anon conspiracy.
Okay, let’s dig in.

So, you recognize these two, right?
Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased multi-millionaire money manager to the richest of the rich (he hanged himself in jail) and his British socialite girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, who currently resides in the Metropolitan Detention Center, of Brooklyn, New York, awaiting trial for trafficking underaged girls to Epstein and several of his high profile clients.
Of course you do.
And you’ve probably seen these:
Of course you have.
But, what about these?
Hmm…
I suspect it depends on what news you watch and read as to which pictures you’ve seen. I’ve seen the Trump photos but just one of Clinton’s prior to this post. Frankly, that’s a problem. I shouldn’t have to watch Fox News to get facts about Clinton’s involvement with a convicted sex pervert.
To be fair, all these photographs were taken before Jeffery Epstein was arrested and convicted of procuring a child for prostitution in 2008. In 2019 after Epstein was busted for sex trafficking, Donald Trump played down their former relationship saying, “I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him. Not a big fan.”
But Trump and Epstein were notorious party pals in the late 90s through the early 2000s, seen in each others company many times in Manhattan and Palm Beach. “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life,” he told New York magazine in 2002.
Predictably the two had a falling out over a property deal in 2004 and haven’t socialized since. In 2007 Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago for being inappropriate with a guest’s daughter.
All right then, what about Bill Clinton?
Clinton insists he’s never been at Epstein private Caribbean island, Little Saint James, where underaged girls reportedly engaged in orgies with some of Epstein’s friends, associates and benefactors. But chief Epstein accuser and sexual trafficking survivor Virginia Roberts Giuffre says otherwise. In 2020, unsealed court documents revealed Giuffre’s testimony that she saw Bill Clinton on Little Saint James island with two teenage girls from New York. Giuffre said she could not recall the their names. She does not claim to have witnessed Clinton engaging in inappropriate conduct with them, nor does she claim that he abused her.
Additionally, the young woman photographed massaging Clinton’s neck, Chauntae Davies, who claims Epstein sexually assaulted and trafficked her, has testified that although Ghislaine Maxwell instructed her to give the massage, “President Clinton was a perfect gentleman during the trip and I saw absolutely no foul play involving him.” The incident happened in 2002 while Epstein’s private jet dubbed the “Lolita Express” was refueling.
Clinton was traveling with Epstein, Maxwell, Chris Tucker and Kevin Spacey to Africa on a humanitarian trip associated with his charity. (The picture of Clinton seated, smoking a cigar was taken on Epstein’s plane.) Flight logs confirm that Clinton flew 26 times aboard the “Lolita Express.” Clinton says it was four times.
Then there are the other politicians, one’s that, unlike Trump and Clinton, Giuffre has accused of abusing her while she was trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell. Let’s see…there’s Prince Andrew, (everybody’s seen that picture and, yeah, I know he’s not really a politician) Ex-New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, former Ambassador to the United Nations and Secretary of Energy under the Clinton administration (he and Bubba are buds) and former Democratic Senator and Senate Majority Leader from Maine George J. Mitchell.
Last and possibly least (I think he’s particularly gross, but that’s just me) there’s Alan Dershowitz, the famous lawyer of O.J. Simpson and Harvey Weinstein and member of Trump’s defense team during his first impeachment trail. Giuffre has accused him, too, of sexual abusing her.
It was Dershowitz who got Epstein the sweetheart deal for his 2008 conviction in which he and four named co-conspirators (along with any unnamed potential co-conspirators) were granted immunity from all federal criminal charges. Epstein served 18 months in conditions that were comparable to Pablo Escobar’s pampered existence at La Catedral prison in Columbia.
In 1997, Dershowitz wrote in an op-ed, “there must be criminal sanctions against sex with very young children, but it is doubtful whether such sanctions should apply to teenagers above the age of puberty, since voluntary sex is so common in their age group.” He went on to opine that “15 was a reasonable age of consent, no matter how old the partner.”
It is these views of Mr. Dershowitz, on age of consent, that spur me to contrarily–but necessarily–play devil’s advocate. The word pedophile is bandied about in the media, describing–in this case–Epstein’s domicile of Little St. James as “pedophile island.” But what is the real definition of a pedophile?
A pedophile is a person who is sexually attracted to prepubescent children, whereas a hebephile is sexually attracted to early adolescent teenagers–ages 11 thru 14–and a ephebophile has a sexual attraction to older teenagers falling below the age of consent. Within these paraphilias there are overlaps and the attraction ranges from preferential to exclusive. While Jeffery Epstein was, no doubt, a contemptuous sexual predator with over lapping paraphilias, he was not–to my knowledge–a pedophile.
The distinction is important because, yes, some abominations are worse than other abominations but, perhaps, even more than that, blurring and exaggerating the lines between deviant, unacceptable and criminal behaviors allows truth to be corrupted with lies. That contamination can lead to outrageous conspiracy theories such as the one about Satanic cabals of Democrats who drink the blood of babies as they seek to take over the world.
And theories like that can lead to riots.
Now, ideally, I should end on that. It’s a good tag line and it sums everything up (plus this getting long and I’m pushing your patience) but I really want to add this anecdote. So here goes…
Years ago, when my husband was still in radio, his boss shared an explosive confidence with him. She swore him to secrecy, just as she had been sworn to secrecy by her best friend, whose son, a member of the Secret Service that guarded the interior of the White House, swore her to secrecy. After all, national security and his job was on the line.
In turn, so explosive was this confidence, my husband (who usually keeps secrets like he keeps watch on our bank account, like a hawk) told me. But before he did, he swore me to secrecy.
That night, hours after everything had calmed down, I suggested that I should pick up some burgers at Steak-n-Shake. He happily agreed. Steak-n-Shake is his favortie.
While I was waiting in the drive thru line, I called my mother. This is pretty much what I said:
“Mom, I’ve got something to tell you. It’s about the president…and it’s bad. It’s all about sex. There’s stuff, I can’t even say…about cigars…and there’s DNA…You’re going to be hearing a lot about it because the whole story is about to break but I wanted to tell you before it does. I think he’s gonna have to resign…”
I love reading things like this. I always believed where there is smoke there is fire. I’m open-minded about conspiracies. Usually not too far out but with certain things yes. Billy Sol Estes I knew nothing about. That is another layer to that story.
You sure got a huge leak on that story and so did your mom! Was your husband a little unhappy with you for spilling the beans?
LikeLiked by 2 people
My husband didn’t know I spilled the beans until years later–and then he didn’t care so much. Ha!
I’m glad you enjoyed it, Max. I spent far too much time on it, but I’m pretty proud of it, I must say.
Thanks for the kind words.
–Pam
LikeLiked by 2 people
My pleasure…it was a fun read. There are so many. Kennedy, the moon landing, Chemtrails, UFO’s, and even John Lennon’s murder gets brought up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it can really get out of hand.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pam, you always lead me to something I didn’t know before and always along a mysterious path. Thank you 🙏
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ve said it many times…you are too kind, DW. Thank you for reading and, most of all, for your kindness and encouragement.
–Pam
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m an easy mark for such theories, as I always presume people like those are involved in anything bad. Money breeds corruption, which in turn corrupts others. It has been that way since the Roman Empire, and it isn’t going to end anytime soon. I enjoyed your article a great deal, Pam. The Kennedy assassination has fascinated me since the day it it happened. I was 11 years old, watched it on TV, and said to my parents “No chance one man did that, from where he was supposed to be hiding”. Oswald said it best, before he was killed. “I’m just the patsy”.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Appreciate you reading, Pete. I’m glad you enjoyed it.
I’m not sure what to believe about the Kennedy assassination. Here are two things I am certain of though: there was an organized crime element evolved that colluded with rouge forces within the government; Oswald was not an innocent patsy.
–Pam
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love the way your story starts with your Mom dropping big secrets on you and then to end it you drop a whopper back to her. Like mother like daughter. Love it.
I can’t get too much into this as it’s only a white bunny and a watch way from me getting lost down the rabbit hole. BUT I will drop this in the mix. Did you perchance see the portrait of “Clinton in a blue dress”? Google it and have a vom-bag ready. Was hung in JE’s place. Yeah that is truly twisted up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Mikey. I love my mom…must of us do.
I have seen that picture floating around but I had NO IDEA that it was in Epstein’s place!! Oh, gross!!
Anyway, I appreciate you reading and commenting.
–Pam
LikeLike
Great post Pam 🙂 As much as I want to believe some or most of what Billie Sol Estes says, the fact that he was jailed for swindling makes me question his credibility. Nevertheless, are you sure, that maybe it was Ted Cruz’s father. who played the major role in John F. Kennedy’s assassination? Ha ha only kidding 🙂 I nod in agreement with you on the Jeffrey Epstein case. As for QAnon, it is little more than a scam. Not only that, somebody who espoused it’s views was also guilty of the same things QAnon spoke against. Here is a link below
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/12/11/2001322/-Louisiana-Republican-who-ran-for-Congress-and-promoted-QAnon-arrested-on-child-pornography-charges
As with Donald Trump, the late great Wayne Barrett also exposed Roger Stone for who he was a long way back. This is link is just one of many examples
https://www.villagevoice.com/2004/04/13/a-dirty-tricksters-bush-bonanza/
Anyway, I love these blog entries of yours rooted in real-life cases. BTW, considering that you already covered Jimmy Swaggert, will you be tackling the exploits of Jim and Tammy Bakker anytime soon in the future on your blog? 🙂
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_PTL_Club
Anyway, keep up the great work as always 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, its the old story…the questionable testimony of questionable people. How much, if any, of it do you believe? Do you just throw it all out? Is there solid evidence to back up the testimony? Is there credible circumstantial evidence to back it up? And if so, how much circumstantial evidence? On and on it goes…Thanks for the links. Interesting.
I’m glad you enjoyed the post. I’m a true crime fan from way back…Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood is one of my favorite books. Brilliant–I think–but it has its much learned detractors, too. Ha! And so it goes…
I touched on the Jim and Tammy Bakker thing in the Swaggert story. Despicable crooks and deceivers, I’d say, but not the worst of the worse–at least not to me. I dislike the sanctimonious Swaggert much more…I don’t know, though, I’ve heard some REALLY crazy stuff about Jim Baker lately, something about him being a rightwing doomsdayer, so…yeah…maybe…Ha!
–Pam
LikeLiked by 1 person
Make no mistake, I still believe that their were numerous people involved in carrying out the assassination of John F. Kennedy, it is just hard to believe somebody like Estes when he was notorious for swindling.
You are right, I forgot that you did mention Jim and Tammy Bakker in that Jimmy Swaggert post. As for Jim Bakker, he is still scamming people it seems. Last year, he got in trouble not once, but twice for selling fake coronavirus cures – here are two links below to those respective stories
https://www.npr.org/2020/03/11/814550474/missouri-sues-televangelist-jim-bakker-for-selling-fake-coronavirus-cure
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jim-bakker-sued-by-second-state-for-selling-fake-coronavirus-cure/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, John. I’ll read up on it. Sounds like a good story…er…well, you know what I mean.
LikeLiked by 2 people
One should not forget that conspiracy theories are the world’s first attempts at explanation. Mythical thinking is full with conspiracies between gods and demons. Today’s conspiracy theories are a modern manifestation of myth.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree…for the most part. Sometimes, truth and fiction bleed together and it’s up to us to suss it out, if we are so inclined.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We all wear cognitive glasses with two different lenses. Through one glass we see the consequences of intentions in everything that happens, through the other we see the consequences of causes. The eyesight of the glasses differs individual for every wearer. In extreme cases, a glass is blind. And then we only see monocular.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, where there’s smoke, there’s fire. I mean, Clinton, of all people, it wouldn’t be surprising about sex with not-quite-legal girls, since he is/was a sex addict, I believe.
And the way the truth can get twisted around–everyone forgets that game we played in school when we stood in a circle, said a line to the first person, and by the time it got back around in the circle it was entirely different.
BUT…the Clinton stuff, it’s funny to look back at how bad we thought it was to the point of he might have to resign….because even though it WAS bad, as far as decorum, responsibility, and even just marital fidelity was concerned, looking back, doesn’t it seem like Disneyland, now, compared to what’s passed? Incredible.
Great investigative journalism, Pam.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks a lot, Stacey. It pleases me that you enjoyed it.
Yes, that whole sordid Clinton affair seems quite tame in comparison to the four years we just went through–and, my goodness, the January 6 insurrection…I don’t have words for that. It’s horrifying. That said (and keep in mind I’m pretty old fashioned when it comes to sexual impropriety) all that about the stain and the cigar, the discussion about what constitutes sex was very icky to me. These matters are PRIVATE.
Frankly, when I heard the skinny, before it hit publicly, I thought there was no way he would allow all the unseemly details to come out. I really thought he would resign. Different place, different time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
PS: Not saying Clinton did have sex with not-quite-legal girls. Just saying it’s not beyond belief, in his case.
And in the vein of conspiracies, one has to wonder if Mr. Epstein offed himself or…. was “helped” to off himself, considering the impressive rolodex of names he probably possessed…that no one would want to see the light of day.
LikeLiked by 2 people
No doubt. I’m highly suspicious about Epstein’s death, but, of course, I’d have to see proof of murder and a cover up to be convinced.
And yes, I’m with you–I’m not saying yea or nay to Clinton, but it wouldn’t surprise me–and, personally, I lean toward, yeah, he probably did do it, but that’s just a gut feeling. I wouldn’t convict him if I was on a jury with what I know…
And I voted for the guy. Twice. As for policy, the economy–I thought he was a good president, not that I agreed with everything but over all, I liked him–even after Monica Lewinsky. I don’t like him now. He was just too close to Espstein–and then he lied about it. The room’s too full of smoke for me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
[…] A Grain of Truth: a Dive into Conspiracy Theories […]
LikeLike