A marriage is a living thing–kind of like an entity, or a soul. Within are the experiences of two lives merged into one.
A birth. An infancy. A childhood.
Then comes the teenage years. And the young adult stage.
Many marriages don’t survive beyond this point, which is usually seven to ten years. Circumstance rears its ugly head; the unexpected looms large and then lowers the boom. The marriage is overcome. Neglected. Or just abandoned.
In this regard marriage shares more qualities with a mistreated pet than it does with a soul. It ages fast. Especially if there are children involved.
Even so, a marriage can live a long, long time. The phrase ‘until death do us part’ comes to mind.
Resilience is key. And commitment. And compromise.
And what of passion? Of love? One might ask.
One might…if one is young. At least, that’s the thesis of first time director/writer/producer Robert Machoian’s achingly quiet, visually stunning dramatic film treatise, The Killing of Two Lovers, in which journeyman actor Clyne Crawford (in a mesmerizingly compelling performance) plays husband, David.
David is young, in his early thirties, but he and his wife, Nikki, have been married for years. She too is young–his age. They have children–a teenage girl and three young boys.
As high school sweethearts in a tiny town they’ve never left, they had their daughter, Jess. For David, Jess is the catalyst of their marriage; for Nikki, she is the reason.
Their story and their images are woven into a stark, purposeful vision that fixates, from a distance, on the expanse of prairie land, of unencumbered skies and tumbleweeds, of the loneliness of barren roads and a windswept playground, sweeping over the desperation of peeling paint, of a crushed cup littering a discount store’s parking lot.
Nikki has grown tired of this life. An aspiring paralegal, she has only recently tasted the first fruits of a career as opposed to a job–they are sweet. The possibilities are sweeter still. A lawyer in the building where she works encourages her to aim higher. They begin an affair.
David knows about it. Even if Nikki wanted to, it would be impossible to keep it secret in a tiny town.
But she doesn’t hide.
She and David have agreed to a separation which means that he lives in his old bedroom of his father’s house, just a short jog down the road. They have also agreed that they can see other people.
Nikki asks if he’s thought about getting his own place.
Still, David clings to hope. He adores his family. All he’s ever wanted to be is Nikki’s husband and a father to their children.
Well, almost. David’s a decent singer songwriter. He was once in a punk band, but he let go of those dreams and never looked back. Nikki’s audience is enough. He loves her.
She loves him too, but differently, gently, even as she steers him toward the roaring waters of divorce. When, during an argument, he is barely able to contain himself, she scolds him, careful to protect his impetuous inner child, though it’s the child she’s grown weary of.
Daughter Jess is weary of him too. David knows this so he coerces her to spend time with him, but spends it romping around with the boys, buying them expensive toys the family can’t afford…rockets. He buys one for Jess also.
When her rocket fails to lift, he doesn’t understand why she storms off. His love for her is oceans wide. Why can’t it be enough?
Funny how it’s not enough to stop him from stalking Derek with a gargantuan pistol, ready at the reach. And it’s not enough to startle him out of blowing Nikki and Derek’s heads off with it either–a toilet flushing thankfully does the trick–when he finds them sleeping together in the home where his children lay. He slinks away as Nikki and Derek barely stir, only to act as if nothing happened when he stops by later to walk the boys to school.
So yes, it’s complicated.
Yet despite David’s dance with murder and Nikki taking her lover into the marital bed, there are no monsters here.
No Jezebel. No Mr. Hyde.
Just David. Just Nikki. Their children. And their marriage.
Therein lies the tragedy. And the movie’s battered, but still beautiful soul.
I have never heard of this movie, but your pertic review of it is beautiful!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. That’s very kind.
–Pam
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sometimes, real life is enough of a story. Great review, Pam. It made me want to watch the film, and no review can ask more of a reader.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Pete. I appreciate you. It’s definitely worth the small investment of time–it’s only 85 minutes long. It’s a very literary film.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will be looking out for it, Pam.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent write Pam. Christine and I saw a preview for this a while ago and it looked amazing, we both said that we need to see that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, Mark. You and Christine will love it. I have no doubt. It’s a very eloquent film.
Thank you.
–Pam
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great review π I have not seen the film yet, but it sounds interesting π Anyway, keep up the great work as always π
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a very good film, John. On that, I think you would/will agree. It’s a quiet film, though. It’s not dialogue driven. Nor are there a lot of bells and whistles or action. The director uses 4:3 framing which is interesting and the soundtrack is innovative (I’m not talking about needledrops here.) The camera work is fantastic. All and all, it may be a little too simplistic for your sensibilities, but I think you would appreciate it’s quality.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Loved the way you laid it out Pam…Never saw it but a disintegration of a marriage is not a pretty thing…it sounds like a study of that subject.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Right; that it is, i.e., the study of a disintegration of a marriage. It is a beautiful film, in it’s own way and it deals poignantly with the unexpected. Thanks for reading.
–Pam
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was a pleasure reading Pam…I’ll tell Bailey and we will see it. All I have to do is mention a film and it’s in front of us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another beautifully written review! Itβs so good to hear from you again, Pam. I hope all is well with you. I thought of you immediately upon hearing of the flooding nearby – so many tragedies over the last couple of years!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hello, DW. Nice to hear from you too! Hope you’ve been well. We are good, the flooding happened about 70 miles west of us. A terrible tragedy. Yes, these natural events are happening with alarming frequency. The earth is rebelling against and reacting to our poor stewardship.
Thank you, my friend for the kind words and for thinking of me.
–Pam
LikeLiked by 2 people
Iβm doing well, thanks. Grateful to have work and family and health. Grace and peace to you
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree with the others, Pam. Very beautifully written review. The filmmakers should read this blog and send you money, ’cause I think you’ve convinced everyone in here to see it, me included! People growing at different speeds and one changing more than the other is usually a sad story involving unrequited love. But that’s life, right? Those things will never stop happening.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Stacey. You summed it up. And, yes, it will never stop happening. There is an unexpected…to call it a twist is too thriller…occurrence that turns the movie on it’s head. and, yet, reaffirms everything you’ve just written. I hope you do see it, Stacey.
–Pam
LikeLiked by 2 people
I probably wouldn’t have seen this movie but you’ve got me intrigued.
Happy Thanksgiving π
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. It is a beautiful movie. Happy Thanksgiving to you too.
LikeLiked by 1 person