Menu Close

All Things Thriller

A Celebration of Thrillers, Noire and Black Comedy by Pamela Lowe Saldana

Wanda (1970): A Groundbreaking American Independent Film Directed by Barbara Loden

Many years ago I lived across the street from a teenage girl, her adolescent brother and their practically nonexistent mother–all of them rather unfortunate looking except for their magnificent red hair.

For the life of me I can’t remember their names…

Bobby. The boy’s name was Bobby…

They lived in one of the many large historic houses of East Nashville, theirs built in the early 20th century, an American Foursquare architectural type, not quite as ornate as a Victorian, but impressive nonetheless.

These days the home has been beautifully, lovingly restored, fetching well over a million dollars in a market where every thing east bank is big bank. But back when my husband and I Iived there, East Nashville was called East Nasty and the Foursquare across the street was ramshackle at best.

So ramshackle, in fact, the sideboards of it’s massive front porch had rotted away, giving access and shelter to a vicious cur and her half grown pack of pups.

The boy had a way with the dogs, commanding them with clicking noises, whistles and hand gestures. And though he terrorized the children of the neighborhood and stole everything he could get his hands on, I had a grudging affection for him. My husband and I would give him pocket money that we couldn’t really spare for odd jobs we really didn’t need.

The girl, on the other hand, we had no interaction with at all, though I would see her, now and again, sitting on the porch or walking down the street, always alone, always with a blank expression.

Sometimes late at night, when I was sitting at the attic window smoking, listening to the cacophony of inner city malaise–the inevitable revving of engines and screeching of brakes, the distant thumping music, angry shouts and, occasionally, gunshots–I would see various young men (young in relative terms, early twenties or so) climb a weathered, yes, ramshackle trestle and disappear into the Foursquare through an open second story widow.

“They’re from the deiseal college up the road,” said Mrs. Gibbony, my octogenarian next door neighbor, when I told her what I’d seen. She flicked her ashes in the wind with a long, yellow forefinger. “You watch, she’ll turn up pregnant.”

And she did.

Then one day I was on Mrs. Gibbony’s front porch having a smoke with her and the girl came out of the Foursquare house and sat on its broad porch steps with her baby–a little girl with the same red hair as the rest of the family. The girl just sat there, holding the baby with lifeless arms, staring off into space, same blank expression.

“Can you believe that girl’s mother works for the Governor?” Mrs. Gibbony scoffed.

“Yeah, I can,” I said.

We laughed.

  • Criterion Collection Edition #965
  • Directed by Barbara Loden • 1970 • United States
    Starring Barbara Loden, Michael Higgins
  • With her first and only feature film—a hard-luck drama she wrote, directed, and starred in—Barbara Loden turned in a groundbreaking work of American independent cinema, bringing to life a kind of character seldom seen on-screen. Set amid a soot-choked Pennsylvania landscape, and shot in an intensely intimate vérité style, the film takes up with distant and soft-spoken Wanda (Loden), who has left her husband, lost custody of her children, and now finds herself alone, drifting between dingy bars and motels, where she falls prey to a series of callous men—including a bank robber who ropes her into his next criminal scheme. An until now difficult-to-see masterpiece that has nonetheless exerted an outsize influence on generations of artists and filmmakers, WANDA is a compassionate and wrenching portrait of a woman stranded on society’s margins.
  • Restored by the UCLA Film & Television Archive. Restoration funding provided by Gucci and The Film Foundation.

Kimi (2022), a Film Directed by Stephen Soderbergh; Popcorn /Techno Thriller

In the best of circumstances Angela is no doubt as edgy as her hair is blue; to this her extreme mannerisms, full force exercise routine and combative attitude attest. But these are not the best of times nor circumstances. A prior sexual assault has badly wounded her. Covid has ripped the wound wide.

Unwilling to commit therapeutically, her tics have ballooned while her world has shrunk to a chic Seattle flat where she monitors the users of Kimi, a voice command speaker, for algorithm coding. Similarly, she monitors her neighbors via the windows of their flats across the street.

Due to its more nuanced and comprehensive recognition of language usage, Kimi, a subsidiary of tech giant Amygdala, is poised for public offering and take over of the voice command speaker market. Hence Angela monitors only anonymous Amygdala executives who possess Kimi prototypes. During a session, she overhears what could be the assault and murder of a user. Unsure, she goes through company protocol instead of going to the police.

It is a decision Angela soon comes to regret.

With Kimi, Steven Soderbergh commandeers the popcorn thriller–an interesting vehicle to showcase his brand of subtle subversive filmmaking. Here he confines his pet themes of sexuality, greed, the upper class, nature vs nurture and cognitive dissonance to a crisp script with a restrained running time that compliments his muscular camara work, ratcheted suspense and edge of your seat action sequences.

In her portrayal of Angela, Zoe Kravitz is serviceable…and I mean that as a compliment. Her gears shift so predictably that when they falter in overdrive, I was not only surprised, I was worried. This reaction owes as much to Kravitz’s understated skill as it does to Soderbergh’s aptitude.

Yet it is within the strength of economy that this well oiled machine stalls. Angela’s tryst with the guy in the flat across the way homage to Rear Window is so short shrift that it comes off as a clunky accessory weighing down an otherwise sleek design.

Babysitter (2022), a Novel written by Joyce Carol Oates; Suspense/Thriller

Joyce Carol Oates is a big deal among the literary elite. So much so the eighty-six year old author is considered a living legend. Her resume–Professor of Creative Writing, Princeton, over fifty novels published, three of them finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, as well as volumes of poetry, short stories and plays–bespeaks gifted intellect, hard work and considerable talent.

So the lady’s got cred, but I’ve never heard of her. That’s no slight. Just means she’s a little rich for my blood.

Not that I read trash. More like “literary pulp”. And that’s what I put in the search. Out popped Joyce Carol Oates. Babysitter.

I immediately recognized the preface. It coalesces around a horrifying true crime case that took place in the 70s in which the killer is known as the Oakland County Child Killer (OCCK) or The Babysitter Killer.

Although the Babysitter claimed four known victims, it is thought that there were many more inner city children trafficked, molested and some murdered by the killer(s) and/or individuals involved in a vast pedophile network that dipped into the most decrepit hovels of Detroit as well as some of the most exclusive, wealthy suburbs in all of the United States. The killer earned the name Babysitter because the four Oakland County victims were found meticulously clean and well fed, though they were held days and, in one case, weeks before they were murdered.

Against this backdrop enters a (bored to tears) upper echelon suburbia wife and mother teetering on forty (and legs as long as Byron’s Don Juan) nearly poreless, bedecked in understated designer wear (logos discreetly–she thinks— forward facing) one Hannah Jarret married to a (moderately) wealthy executive named Wes.

Here I will interject, as I was miming Miss Oates verbose style–in Babysitter at least–the run on sentence, its copious parentheses and inordinate italics. The style is befitting of the character Hannah: exhausting. How you will feel about its prose may very well depend on how you feel about long distance running.

If not acquainted with Oates, you may want to “train” on her earlier works such as the short story, Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been? I have recently read it and it is superb.

In any event back to Babysitter: Hannah does what any bored, upper echelon suburbia housewife from the 70s would do –or, at least, that’s what Oates in her indictment of time and place would have us believe–she has an affair. It’s her choice of paramour that is eyebrow raising. She knows him only as Y.K.

Whereas as husband Wes is relatively handsome, Y.K. is not. No, not with his heavy, blue lidded eyes. Not with his tawny skin and thick curled toenails; his wire bristled hair and brow of Frankenstein.

His character, no less surly: sadist.

He brutalizes Hannah, yet she is drawn to him. Y.K. is a man of discerning taste. He has money–and designer clothes. These are the prerequisites that Hannah requires.

Oh…and his audacity…he strokes her wrist with his thumb at a gala she’s hosting. She prepares to introduce her children to Y.K. as Babysitter is wreaking havoc, terror and murder, going so far to attack a child in an even more affluent suburb than Hannah’s.

Husband Wes is quick to lay blame at an inner city black man’s door…any inner city black man’s door…but not Hannah. Though comically neurotic to the point of nervous breakdown, poisoned by passive aggression, feminine mystique and white privilege, Hannah knows Babysitter is not in the order of the other, but a grandmaster of us.

Still she hesitates to sound the alarm, stymied by fear of gossip…Wes’ secret Swiss bank accounts…his influential family…their high priced attorneys…her Saint Laurent wardrobe. Indeed, Hannah could loose everything.

As a near fembot navigating Oates cliched environs, the question is not will she, but how could she not?

Revanche, A Film Directed by Gotz Spielmann (2008); Thriller, Revenge Yarn; Austria

Do I recommend the thriller Revanche?

It should be simple to answer, right?

Just a yea. Or a nay.

But it’s not…simple. Not for me.

If you’ve read my blog before then you know I can’t…that I’m just not capable of one word answers. You know that…not that there aren’t exceptions to the rule…it’s like grammar…English…there’s always an exception.

Case in point…Die Hard. Now, I could give it a one word answer…review…what have you…and be done. It would be bold–just like the sobriquet character, John McClane.

But Revanche is not like that. Revanche is much more nuanced. It’s foreign. Artsy. There are no easily discernable tropes that scream–this is a thriller. It’s not taut…it meanders… but not in a hazy, surrealistic way. And there are subtitles.

So what’s the plot, you ask?

Well, revanche is French for revenge so it’s a revenge yarn. And when I say yarn, I’m using the term metaphorically… like it’s actual yarn. That doesn’t make it bad…if you like knitting. Or crochet.

But, here’s the twist…or I should say, a twist…Revanche is an Austrian film. And Austrians speak German. In the German language Revanche has a double meaning. It means revenge, yes…but it also means re-match…or second chance.

Anyhoo, there’s this young woman. Her name is Tamara. She’s being sex trafficked. Despite this…and worrisome cocaine habit…she has retained a gentle childlike quality that glints unexpectedly…like when she clasps her hands and prays.

Tamara has a boyfriend…an ex-con named Alex. He works for the traffickers, but he’s not a bad guy…he’s just lazy…and scruffy. He is also madly in love with Tamara.

Alex devises a plot to rob a bank so they can escape and start a new life together. He’s very enthused and pleased with himself over this caper.

Tamera?…not so much.

Alex tries to assuage her by demonstrating that his gun isn’t loaded. He does so by putting it to his head and pulling the trigger. He likes to do silly things like that…things that border on creepy…like pointing the gun at Tamara…and waking her up with a ski mask covering his face.

Needless to say Tamara is not assuaged…she won’t sign off unless he takes her with him . Alex reluctantly agrees, but makes her wait in the car while he robs the bank. He laughs at her when she prays.

Oh…the car. It’s blocking an alley…so there’s that…and of course a cop comes a long…

Alex manages to escape with the money, but not with Tamara. He’s devastated… and very pissed off. He hightails it to his grandfather’s rustic, rural home where he hides out…and relentlessly chops a mountain of wood.

At first grandpa is none too pleased to see Alex–let alone put him up. Alex says his mom told him to come help. Grandpa is skeptical. He’s aware of his grandson’s indiscretions with the law…just not this latest one…plus Alex barely says two words to him.

But gradually…remember what I said about the yarn?…their relationship begins to thaw. Much to his surprise, grandpa actually benefits form the arrangement. Now that he doesn’t have to shoulder all the chores, he has more energy. He takes up playing the accordion again.

Grandpa has a young woman friend…a neighbor who looks in on him from time to time. Her name is Susanne.

Susanne desperately wants a child…she has recently miscarried…but her husband, Robert, suffers from some psychological issues having to do with a trauma suffered at his job. He is rarely interested in intimacy of any kind.

Even though it’s out of her character…she’s a very nice woman…Susanne throws herself at Alex. He makes it monosyllabically clear that he wants nothing to do with her. But she persists.

Then one day while Alex is grocery shopping with grandpa, he overhears Susanne…she works at the store…talking about a bank robbery. She says her husband, Robert, happened to encounter the robbers…a man and a woman…in a car…blocking an alley…

Baby’s Breath

The bed is cold
but you must rest
A sweater worn
of fashion sense
Room with view
at your behest,
and lattice weaved
in baby's breath

If you could run
you'd walk with them,
but bide the time
until then
spring looms and blooms
with the scent
of seaside breeze
and baby's breath

May God Save Us, a Film Directed by Rodrigo Sorogoyen; Police Procedural, Psychological Drama, Thriller; Spain

It is very rare to run into a perfect movie…but it happens. That’s why it’s rare .

And, it goes without saying, what is and isn’t perfect, what is nearly perfect, or a far cry form it, is subjective. Case in point: McCabe & Mrs. Miller.

Everything…the screenplay. The cinematography. The acting. The soundtrack…yes, even the bits of conversation that can’t quite be heard…is perfect.

But some people are meh about McCabe & Mrs. Miller. And some people just don’t like it. And that’s okay. It’s not like E.T., or Jurassic Park. It’s not for everyone.

Anyway, as you might have guessed, this movie–not McCabe & Mrs. Miller–but this movie, may not be your cup of tea. Then again, if you like gritty police procedurals with strong thriller elements…if you speak fluent Spanish…or, even if you don’t and don’t mind subtitles…you’re gonna love May God Save Us. I’d bet money on it.

But you’ve gotta have a strong stomach. Keep that in mind.

That said, the movie begins with a gorgeous, broad camera shot of a busy intersection of Madrid. Director Rodrigo Sorogoyen takes us into the architecture and vibe of a second tier artery system–its markets, its cafes, its apartments–so that we can see with our own eyes, hear with our own ears, and feel with the nerve endings down our own spine, the pulsating, multidimensional rhythm of the city.

It’s quite prosperous. Beautiful. And religious…Catholic.

So Catholic, in fact, the Pope is scheduled for a visit and everybody’s pretty happy about it–except for the cops. And that’s understandable since everybody in Spain (shoot, people from all over the world) are going to be flooding into Madrid. Makes their job that much tougher.

True. But that’s not the reason they’re so upset.

The cops are upset because a serial killer is attacking their city. And he’s targeting old ladies. He rapes them. Beats them to death.

Very grim…just awful…I told you up front it might not be your cup of tea. And it’s graphic…not gratuitously, but still. Proceed with caution.

That said, May God Save Us is what you call a two-hander–that’s where there are two main characters in a film, a play or a television program. And since I already told you it’s a police procedural, you’ve probably already guessed that the two main characters are cops.

Two male cops…who don’t like each other.

One, Javier (Roberto Alamo) is an impulsive, tall and muscular, physically expressive man child. He’s got a little sumpin’, sumpin’ going on in the sex appeal department, but has problems with his wife and step-daughter. Oh, he loves them, alright…tries to be good to them, but he doesn’t speak their language. Plus he’s selfish.

The other cop may be a little younger, but he doesn’t look it. Bookish, awkward, smart, he’s not tall at all. He has a crush on a maid in his apartment building…doesn’t have clue what to do about it. That, and he stutters. His name is Luis (Antonio de la Torre.)

Meanwhile the Pope is going to be in Madrid soon. The police chief wants the serial killer caught before the Pope-jet touches down. We’re going strictly by the book here, until there’s a shift. It happens quite abruptly. We’re on the same streets as before, but now we’re seeing them through the killer’s eyes. We’ve seen him before, too. He’s not what we expect.

Well, he is and he isn’t…he’s very young. Mid twenties. And he’s handsome in an unsettling sort of way. It’s as if his whole being is fashioned into the tip of a long thin blade. His nose, his chin, his lips…he’s very fastidious about his clothes and appearance.

Though we are shocked when we first encounter him, we watch his ritual with a dreadful awe…the stride of his step, how quickly he sizes up his prey…we think we know what makes him tick. But his mask is still on. We have seen his crimes only through Luis’ psychological profiling. Now, within the films shift, we are voyeurs watching the killer’s process. It is, I suppose, like watching sausage being made. Not only do we see his mask slip, we watch him rip it off. Terrifying.

In his country of Spain, Sorogoyen is an acclaimed artist winning seven Goya awards for direction and original screenplay for The Realm, The Beasts, Stockholm, Mother and May God Save Us. In the latter film, Sorogoyen merges the genres of police procedural, psychological drama and full out thriller with a deft hand, splicing it into three acts, the first of which is the procedural where we are introduced to the methodology and victimology of the killer and the unfortunate women who star in his crimes.

The middle portion of the film takes the form of a psychological drama where the focus is on police officers Javier and Luis and their secret inner world. There we are like flies on a wall as they go about their day to day life, interacting with one another, their fellow officers and those in their private life.

The third act is all thriller, with Luis and Javier drawing ever closer to identifying the killer and reconciling their own demons. It’s as twisted and tortuous as an unregulated rollercoaster ride.

And then, there’s the epilogue.

Transversal Intersection: Psychological Thriller; Insomnia (1997),Erik Skjoldbjaerg; Strangers on a Train (1951), Alfred Hitchcock

Of course, everyone has seen Strangers on a Train, the quintessential psychological thriller by the master, Alfred Hitchcock. Quintessential not because it is the best, though it is deservedly in the top 2o of just about every cinephile’s list, but because it is the best representation of the genre through the lens of its elements: light verses dark, the shades of gray in-between, twinning, egocentric love and hate, the physical, dogged pursuit of control, the fear and anguish of losing it.

In fact, in all of cinema, no director’s cannon is more ubiquitously symbiotic with the psychological thriller than Hitchcock’s, with the possible exception of the great Ingmar Bergman. (That the latter’s work tilts more toward drama is duly noted.) Still, it is interesting that Erik Skjoldbjaerg, director of the equally quintessential new wave Scandinavian psycho-thriller Insomnia (1997), tips his hat not so much to his fellow Swede, but to the Englishman.

Bleak. Intriguing. Haunting. Insomnia is more noir-like than Strangers on a Train. It is also more economical with action and more reliant on atmosphere and rumination. In this way, more like Bergman.

Yes, there are chases, combat and gunplay–but not because they are formulaic. Here realism trumps style. Action is the consequence of physics.

In Strangers on a Train, the plot coalesces around a complicated conspiracy between two men, one of them as fundamentally decent as he is desperate to find a way out of circumstances orchestrated by the other, a sadistic psychopath. Their conspiracy represents the intrusion of evil, via circumstance and stress, into an otherwise stable psyche. Insomnia is about much the same thing, but here the conspiracy is less grandiose, while the conspirators are similarly troubled souls– one a cop, the other his quarry.

Jonas Engstrom (Stellan Skarsgard) is the cop, a high ranking homicide detective; a star of sorts–this in spite a rather public incident in which a skeleton escaped his closet. Thus he’s sent to a snow drift above the Arctic Circle in the hinterlands of Norway, tasked with leading the investigation into the murder of a seventeen year old girl. The local cops are worried; the killer’s MO is sophisticated and there are possible signatures pointing to serial homicide.

In Tromso, he is assigned to a reginal supervisor, Hilde Hagan (Gisken Armand) with whom he may or may not have history. Though friendly, even coy–like Strangers’ provocative Barbara (Patricia Hitchcock)–she is leery of him too.

Taciturn, enigmatic, clocked in steely attractiveness and stylish attire, Engstrom is not an easy man to like. He makes insensitive comments about untoward observations of which he either thinks are funny, or doesn’t bat an eye.

His male colleagues whisper behind his back. Hagan does not.

Engstrom checks into an inn where a no nonsense, yet comely clerk is attracted to him. Appreciating that he doesn’t hit her up for drinks or intrude on her personal space with innuendos, she mistakes his uneasiness for politeness. She gives him tape so that he can fix the shade to the window. Daylight is as unrelenting as the temperatures are cool in the city of Tromso–the phenomenon of the midnight sun.

As Engstrom makes the rounds of his investigation, attending the dead girls autopsy–her name is Tanja–sifting through belongings that are too expensive for her to afford, interviewing school mates, getting rough with an uncooperative boyfriend, the ever present sheen of sweat above his top lip spreads across his face. This despite snow still visible in summer. The tape isn’t working. And Engstrom is a man who needs what little sleep his is accustomed to.

Increasingly erratic, he is unable to suppress his inner tawdriness. When the comely hotel clerk makes an advance, his response is inappropriately aggressive. He reacts similarly with Froya, a cynical, world weary teen who he intimidates into disclosing the identity of Tanja’s fifty-something suitor.

His name is Jon Holt (Bjorn Floberg), a writer of pulp fiction, a man of means though he no longer looks it. Gamy. Desolate. Frayed. In him, Engstrom meets his match. More harbinger than doppelganger, Holt is older than his pursuer. That he isn’t as smart is of little consequence. He knows Engstrom’s secrets; he has the receipts.

Unlike the sadistic Bruno (Robert Walker), who relishes Guy’s (Farley Granger) predicament in Strangers on a Train, he takes no pleasure in witnessing Engstrom’s pain or doling out his punishment. When Engstrom announces his plan to frame Tanja’s boyfriend, Holt’s piercing blue eyes blink before they film over, first with surprise and then with empathy.

In his full length picture debut, Skjoldbjaerg turns the essence of noir upside down. Here sunlight pervasively penetrates and darkness is largely confined to the mind, so demons are left to crouch in coastal Tromso’s atmospheric fog more than shadow. Fittingly Skjoldbjaerg films within the glare of white on white–curtains, walls, latex gloves, blanched skin–and in miry hues of seafoam, sage, cornflower and slate. It is a sickly pallet offset with pops of richness.

The camera work is largely straightforward, giving Insomnia a weathered, wind swept look. But Skjoldbjaerg embellishes Engstrom’s sleep deprivation induced psychosis with hallucinatory jump cuts, filmed from angles that blur his perspective of time, space and place, as well as his sense of self.

All this begs the question, is Insomnia really a thriller?

And is Skjoldbjaeg really channeling Hitchcock’s Strangers on a Train?

In one of the only sequences filmed in darkness, Engstrom chases the killer through a bunker and we are reminded of Bruno pursuing Miriam in a boat through the tunnel of love. There, Hitchcock ratchets up the tension by using a night time setting against a continuum of light: the glare of carnival rides; silvery flashes in the tunnel; the subtle glow of a lighter. Though Miriam is aware she is being pursued and who is pursuing her, she is unaware she’s being stalked. Sexually charged, she looses sight of Bruno and her head is on a swivel. He is chasing her and she is chasing him.

In the bunker scene, the chase is on foot. Engstrom doesn’t know who the killer is, having seen him only from a distance. The killer escapes into a bunker and Engstrom, with cohorts in tow, runs after him toward the light at the end. But when he gets there he finds it isn’t really light–it’s fog. He disappears into it where he is unable to discern who is who, and who is chasing who.

If that’s not an homage to Hitchcock and, more specifically, Strangers on a Train, I’ll eat Erik Skjoldbjaerg’s hat.

Worth Another Look: I Walk the Line (1970), a Film Directed by John Frankenheimer; Drama

Henry Tawes (Gregory Peck) strides with an air of superiority, decked out in a perfectly pleated, crisply pressed sheriff’s uniform, patrolling the East Tennessee hill country and, by extension, its humble folk in John Frankenheimer’s drama, I Walk the Line (1970). Tall, broad-shouldered and lean, he is bestowed with a shock of salt and pepper hair that sweeps across his brow. A sharply pointed nose and narrow lips betray a common Scotts-Irish ancestry, though Henry’s are sculpted with privilege whereas most of his constituents’ are shaped by harsher elements.

The good sheriff’s home is equally impressive, well built and roomy with a covered porch and rocking chairs painted white. His wife (Estelle Parsons) is an overly accommodating, talkative bird open to pleasing her husband by way of articles in The Readers Digest. He reciprocates her advances with an iceberg shoulder.

Similarly, he barley tolerates his daughter–she is about twelve–acknowledging her with pursed lips and a slight tilt of his head. He treats everyone this way, yes even himself.

One day he pulls over a shabby pickup bearing a load of sugar and a comely blonde somewhere in her early twenties. She too is talkative, but to her Henry actually listens as his unaccustomed lips form the beginnings of a smile.

Her name is Alma (Tuesday Weld). She is the daughter of an itinerate bootlegger and the sibling and caretaker of his two sons. The sheriff’s attraction to her is instantaneous, but he tries not to show it. Alma is not fooled.

Later, around a slovenly dinner table, she and her father plot the good sheriff’s seduction. It goes off without a hitch–at first. What Alma and her father underestimate is their mark’s susceptibility to obsession through the conduit of unrequited passion. Of course, Henry underestimates it most of all.

Director Frankenheimer’s film cannon is comprised most notably with early 1960s political dramas (The Manchurian Candidate, Seven Days in May) in which his masculine protagonists are besieged by external plots that coalesce around their own psychological disturbances. I Walk the Line, made in the early 70s but set a decade earlier, is a continuance of such themes with Alma and her family representing a festering rebellion threatening to erupt in response to suffocating repression.

Unfortunately, coming on the heels of revolutionary counter culture films like Easy Rider, The Swimmer, Midnight Cowboy and Five Easy Pieces, Frankenheimer’s offering got lost in the turbulence of the times. However, when viewed without the late 60s early 70s coke bottle lens, focusing instead on its panoramic photography, affecting cast and a starkly eloquent screenplay–not to mention the Johnny Cash infused soundtrack–I Walk the Line is a simple, yet, convincing personal drama about the unraveling of a tightly wound man.

I Walk the Line was filmed in Gainesboro, Tennessee and along the dam and banks of the beautiful Center Hill Lake, some eighty miles from our Nashville home. My family and I use to boat, camp and hike there when my children were small.

Piggy (2022), a Film directed by Carlota Pereda, Starring Laura Galan, Spain; Horror, Exploitation

From time to time, I remember hearing my mother say to her sister, to one of her friends, or to a patron at work (she was a hair stylist), “kids can be cruel.” This was no revelation to me since I had experienced it first hand; I skipped kindergarten and went straight into first grade in a private school with rigorous academics. I knew my colors, could count to 13 and say my ABCs…and that was about it.

So yeah. I got made fun of. But not like Sara (Laura Galan) in Carlota Pereda’s Spanish horror film Piggy, thank God.

You’ve probably guessed from the film’s unflattering title (not to mention the featured image) that Sara is overweight. If so, you’re wrong.

She’s obese. And she doesn’t try to hid it. To do so would be futile.

Sara is also, as my mother would say, “pretty in the face.” She has a thick mane of wavy brown-black hair and expressive eyes of the same color. Her skin is as smooth as her expression is forlorn. There are many reasons for her despair, of which obesity is only a symptom.

Numero uno: Su madre (Carmen Machi). She’s…how shall I say it? A bitch.

There’s absolutely nothing Sara can do to please her. What’s more, she goes around announcing–quite loudly–her daughter’s sizeable, but typical teenage foibles. For example, when Sara unexpectantly gets her period her mother makes a big deal out of it, turning down a gentleman who has offered them a ride home because her daughter might mess up the white seats of his car.

Seriously? Who does that?

Wait. It gets worse.

The gentleman in the car? His son is setting next to him. And he’s a teenager too, about Sara’s age.

See what I mean?

Even so, as crazy as it might sound, Sara’s mother loves her. She does. El madre does her best to protect her daughter, although that refuge usually collapses on Sara–and everybody else in the vicinity–instead. Nonetheless, Sara needs all the protection she can get.

Case in point: Maca (Claudia Salas).

Maca is a sadist rich-girl bitch who sets her sites on Sara–hence the nickname Piggy. What’s more, Sara’s used-to-be-best-friend, Claudia (Irene Ferreiro) pals around with Maca and her cohorts now.

One day Sara decides to go to the community’s pool built around a natural spring. She shoots for an off hour when she hopes nobody will be there. And seemingly she’s in luck because when she gets there nobody’s around. Not even the lifeguard.

She dives in. When she’s pops back up she comes face to face with a hulking man whose stomach is as robust as her own.

She’s shocked. And, as usual, clumsily embarrassed.

She dives again, deeper this time, and we see that she’s quite the underwater swimmer. We watch as she obliviously, gracefully streamlines by the submerged body of the lifeguard whose hands are lashed behind his back. When she resurfaces the hulking man has disappeared, but now she is face to face with something far more insidious.

Maca.

The teenage harpy plumets Sara with the pool net and manages to trap her head under the water with it, almost drowning her. All this while her cohorts gleefully laugh, as Claudia looks on a little uncomfortably.

Sara manages to escape her tormentors, but she does so without her clothes or benefit of a towel. She is forced to make a harrowing trek through the woods and down a rural road, trying desperately to avoid prying, disapproving eyes.

It’s during this journey that she runs into Maca and Claudia again, only this time the tables have turned and they are the one’ being tormented–and abducted–by the hulking man at the pool (Richard Holmes). Maca and Claudia scream for help. Sara sees the hulking man and he see’s her.

In one bloody hand he wields a huge serrated hunting knife. In the other he has a towel.

Like Tobe Hooper’s iconic Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) and, to some lesser extent, Greg McLean’s Wolf Creek (2005) director Carlota Pereda infuses her film with an eerie, washed-out beauty. But while the former films have sudden busts of splendorous cinematography, Pereda imbibes hers with the disconcertingly sunny paradox of Galan’s gift of physical comedy, all of which she does with a hardcore, realistic despondency.

It’s a brilliant performance in an equally brilliant film. And though it never really scares us, it horrifies us all the better.

Happy Halloween everybody.

Newer Posts
Older Posts